Legal Opinion

Villani v. Seibert Appeal of: Seibert

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 26, 2017No. Villani v. Seibert Appeal of: Seibert - No. 66 MAP 2016PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHIEF JUSTICE SAYLOR

In this interlocutory direct appeal by permission, we consider whether a legislative enactment recognizing a cause of action for wrongful use of civil proceedings infringes upon this Court’s constitutionally prescribed power to regulate the practice of law, insofar as such wrongful-use actions may be advanced against attorneys.

The underlying litigation arose out of a land-ownership dispute between Jean Louse Villani, who was a co-plaintiff with her late husband until his death, and defendants John Seibert, Jr. and his mother, Mary Seibert (“Appellants”). Appellants…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. United States v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  3. Laudenberger v. Port Auth. of AlleghenySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Maritrans GP Inc. v. Pepper, Hamilton & ScheetzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Yost v. TorokSupreme Court of Georgia · 1986

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Yocum v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Gaming Control BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  2. Brown, J. v. Halpern, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  3. Commonwealth v. KolovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
  4. Raynor, N. v. D'Annunzio, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. Crawford, S., Aplts. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API