Gump v. Gump
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Two actions were filed against the defendant—one for the rescission of a property settlement agreement, and one to set aside a final decree of divorce. The actions were consolidated for trial and plaintiff had one judgment granting her the relief prayed for in each action.
The defendant herein commenced a suit for divorce against this plaintiff in February, 1936. His wife filed a cross-complaint. A property settlement was executed by the parties, and, on March 19,1936, an interlocutory decree of divorce was entered on the cross-complaint. On March 31, 1937, a final decree of divorce was…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Cruise v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Shinn v. ShinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
- Phillis v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
- Anza Parking Corp. v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.