Legal Opinion

Gump v. Gump

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 18, 1940No. Civ. 11557PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.

Two actions were filed against the defendant—one for the rescission of a property settlement agreement, and one to set aside a final decree of divorce. The actions were consolidated for trial and plaintiff had one judgment granting her the relief prayed for in each action.

The defendant herein commenced a suit for divorce against this plaintiff in February, 1936. His wife filed a cross-complaint. A property settlement was executed by the parties, and, on March 19,1936, an interlocutory decree of divorce was entered on the cross-complaint. On March 31, 1937, a final decree of divorce was…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  2. McGuinness v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Sohler v. SohlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Jeffords v. YoungCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  5. Simonton v. Los Angeles Trust & Savings BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Whitlow v. DurstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Cruise v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. Shinn v. ShinnNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Phillis v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  5. Anza Parking Corp. v. City of BurlingameCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API