Cruise v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The trial court, after first denying plaintiffs’ motion to amend their complaint, granted defendant city’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs appeal. It was the theory of the trial court that the complaint was fatally defective in that it disclosed that the claim required to be filed in such actions was filed ten days too late, and that facts sufficient to raise an estoppel were not pleaded.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff Fannie B. Cruise, while a passenger on a city bus, was injured as the result of the negligence of the operator of the bus, and that, as a result of the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Farrell v. County of PlacerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Natural Soda Products Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- MacIsaac v. PozzoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
- Redlands High School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Benner v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- Crumpler v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Industrial Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Munoz v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
- County of Santa Clara v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Shoban v. Board of Trustees of Desert Center Unified School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.