Legal Opinion
Gill v. Bromley
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 9, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, C. J.
The petitioner alleges these facts: He was the husband of Charlotte Bromley; they lived together as husband and wife until on or about March 6th, 1904, when, without cause, his wife left him and continued to live apart from him, without cause, until her death on December 21st, 1922. A will purporting to be executed by her was filed in the Court of Probate for the district of New Haven and the defendant Bromley was in the will appointed sole executor and proceeded with the settlement of her estate. In this settlement he falsely and fraudulently represented to the Court of Probate that the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Delehanty v. PitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Orcutt's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
- Olmstead's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1875
- Mathews v. SheehanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Sisk v. MeagherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1909
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Palmer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Folwell v. HowellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- Palmer v. PalmerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
- Robinson v. GumanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Appeal From Probate of WilliamsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.