Legal Opinion

Folwell v. Howell

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 8, 1933PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.

The complaint in this action alleges that the plaintiffs are the sole heirs at law of Alice F. Burritt, who died May 6th, 1930, leaving a will which has been admitted to probate and in which the defendant Louis B. Howell was named executor; that this will was procured by the fraud, imposition and undue influence exercised by him and the other defendant, his wife, upon the deceased, the details of which are set forth at considerable length and with some redundancy; that the plaintiffs knew little or nothing about the property, mental condition and affairs of the deceased, or the daily…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Johnson v. WatersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
  3. Allis v. HallSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  4. Baker v. O'RiordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Delehanty v. PitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Dunham v. DunhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  2. Rossignol v. Danbury School of Aeronautics, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Foran v. CarangeloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
  4. DelVecchio v. DelVecchioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
  5. Ruick v. TwarkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API