Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Guman

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1972PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMacDonald, J.

This is an appeal by three heirs-at-law of Howard E. Lane, late of Bridgeport, who died intestate, from a judgment of the Superior Court which, in effect, sustained certain orders and decrees of the Probate Court for the district of Bridgeport. The sole issue presented is whether the plaintiffs, two of whom were nonresidents of Connecticut and the third a resident of Connecticut but not of the probate district of Bridgeport, were given legal notice of the proceedings involved so as to limit the time for their appeal from the Probate Court’s orders to thirty days.

The undisputed facts as…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Farrell v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Goodrich v. FerrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  3. Heiser v. Morgan Guaranty Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  4. Delehanty v. PitkinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
  5. Haverin v. WelchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1942

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Anderson v. LudginSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  3. Red Hill Coalition, Inc. v. Conservation CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Frazier v. MansonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
  5. All Brand Importers, Inc. v. Department of Liquor ControlSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API