Legal Opinion

Olmstead's Appeal from Probate

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided October 15, 1875PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from the doings of commissioners on the estate of Joseph Olmstoad, deceased; brought to the Superior Court in Eairftold County, and tried to the court before Sanford, J. Judgment for appellees and motion for a new trial by appellant. The case is fully stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.

This is an appeal from the doings of the commissioners on the estate of Joseph Olmstead, deceased.

Three reasons are assigned for the appeal:

1st. The disallowance of sundry claims presented by the appellant against said estate:

2d. The allowance of a certain claim in favor of Isaac Drew against said estate:

3d. “ Because the said Joseph Olmstead, deceased, was, at the time of his death, a legal inhabitant, tax-payer, and elector of {he town of Soutlibury, in the probate district of Woodbury; and neither the probate court for the district of Bridgeport, which took cognizance of the settlement of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sears v. TerrySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  2. Cutts v. HaskinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1813
  3. Wildman v. RiderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1854
  4. First National Bank v. BalcomSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
  5. Moss's Appeal from ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Palmer v. ReevesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  2. Orcutt's Appeal From ProbateSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892
  3. Palmer v. PalmerDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1940
  4. Barton v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1902
  5. Fayerweather v. MonsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1892

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API