Sisk v. Meagher
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Plea in Abatement and motion to erase an appeal to this court taken by the defendant.
1Opinion of the CourtRoraback, J.
The plaintiff filed in this court a plea in abatement and a motion to erase an appeal, both for the reasons that the defendant had not followed the requirements of the General Statutes relating to appeals.
The following material facts are conceded: This case was tried to the court, and was decided in favor of the plaintiff on July 18th, 1908, when the judge filed his written memorandum of decision. Notice of an appeal was filed by the defendant July 20th, 1908. January 13th, 1909, the judgment-file, dated as of July 18th, 1908, was prepared by the judge and filed with the clerk. Afterward upon…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- O'brien's PetitionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Goldreyer v. CronanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1903
- Bulkeley's AppealSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1904
- Corbett v. MatzSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1900
- Sturdevant v. StantonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. GrimesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Jaquith v. RevsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Murphy v. Elms HotelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
- State v. LindsaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Bogaert v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.