Legal Opinion
Colby v. Daniels
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided June 21, 1927No. 16346PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONK, C.
The plaintiff in error was defendant, and the defendant in error was plaintiff, in the court below. In this opinion the parties will be referred to as in the trial court.
B. F. Daniels, as plaintiff, instituted this action in the court below against the defendant, L. O. Colby, by filing the following petition:
“Comes now the plaintiff, B. F. Daniels, and represents and shows to the court that both he and the defendant, B. O. Colby, are residents of McClain county, Okla.; that for cause of action against defendant, plaintiff alleges and states; ,
“That Dr. J. H. Colby is the husband of B.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Wingate v. RenderSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Great Western Life Ins. Co. v. SparksSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Wyrick v. CampbellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
- Florence v. RussellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Hammett v. StateSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hall Jones Oil Corporation v. ClaroSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969
- Allison v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 1953
- B. v. Emery & Co. v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
- Norman's Heritage Real Estate Company, D/B/A Realty World--Norman's Heritage Real Estate Company v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
- Moseley v. BoydSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.