Legal Opinion

Moyer v. Cordell

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 13, 1951No. 33848PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LUTTRELL, V.C;J.

This is an action for-damages, brought by the plaintiff, Ed Cordell, against the defendant Melvin Moyer, and others. The trial court overruled the demurrer of defendants to the evidence of plaintiff, denied their motions for directed verdict, and submitted the cause to the- jury, which returned a verdict for plaintiff. The defendant Melvin Moyer alone appeals.

Plaintiff was the operator of a beer tavern in the city of Gage, and the action arose out of the closing of the tavern by the city marshal of Gage, who was one of the defendants in the action, and the arrest of plaintiff…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Price v. McComishCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  2. Kurn v. RadencicSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
  3. Halliburton-Arbott Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  4. Sinclair Oil & Gas Co. v. AllenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
  5. Allen v. RamseySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Chandler v. DentonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
  2. State Ex Rel. Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1974
  3. Silkwood v. Kerr-McGee Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  4. Barber v. HohlNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956
  5. Baden v. Sunset Fuel Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API