Legal Opinion

Lingvall v. Bartmess

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 27, 1999No. 23302-9-IIPublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Armstrong, A.C.J.

Robert and Shirley Bartmess appeal a judgment granting a driveway easement by prescription to Jo Vonne Lingvall and quieting title to a triangle section of property on which the driveway sits (the triangle) to Lingvall’s successor-in-interest, Cindy Sue Price. They argue that Lingvall’s use of the driveway and triangle was permissive and that Lingvall did not adversely possess the triangle for the 10-year period. They also argue that the trial court erred in granting Lingvall title to the triangle by adverse possession and a prescriptive easement on the same property. We…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Petersen v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Standing Rock Homeowners Ass'n v. MisichCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Kobza v. TrippCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  3. Kunkel v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  4. Kunkel v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Drake v. SmershCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API