Legal Opinion

Drake v. Smersh

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 10, 2004No. 51882-8-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAgid, J.

Appellants Robert and Jane Doe Smersh (Smersh) appeal a trial court decision granting their neighbors, respondents Jess and Sandra Drake (Drake), a prescriptive easement over a driveway located primarily on Smersh’s land. Smersh argues that there is a presumption of permissive use which the trial court improperly ruled had terminated when Smersh’s predecessor in interest sold the servient land in 1975. But we agree with Drake’s position that the permissive use presumption does not apply in this case, and there was sufficient evidence to establish the adverse element of his prescriptive…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Haley v. Medical Disciplinary BoardWashington Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Kunkel v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. Kunkel v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. City of Longview v. WallinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  2. Sligar v. OdellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  3. Nickell v. SOUTHVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  4. Gamboa v. ClarkWashington Supreme Court · 2015
  5. Sligar v. OdellCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API