Kunkel v. Fisher
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
In a claim for a prescriptive easement, the use of another’s property is presumed to be permissive. The trial court erred when it failed to apply this presumption to the Kunkels’ claim of a prescriptive easement over the Fisher property. Because the Kunkels did not put forth sufficient evidence to overcome the presumption, we reverse.
FACTS
The Kunkels operated a house-moving business and kept trucks at their home in Lynnwood, Washington. By at least 1977, John Kunkel began parking trucks at the back of his property. The access to the back of his property was across adjacent property belonging…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Chaplin v. SandersWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- Northwest Cities Gas Co. v. Western Fuel Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- ITT Rayonier, Inc. v. BellWashington Supreme Court · 1989
- Roediger v. CullenWashington Supreme Court · 1946
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Drake v. SmershCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Drake v. SmershCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Nickell v. SOUTHVIEW HOMEOWNERS ASS'NCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- McMILIAN v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- McMilian v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.