Legal Opinion

Petersen v. Port of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 10, 1980No. 45817PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHicks, J.

This direct appeal concerns an inverse condemnation action started in November 1974, against the Port of Seattle. The Petersens (plaintiifs/appellants) owned and resided upon property located about 2 miles south of Sea-Tac Airport since before the airport was opened. They seek to recover the diminished value of their property resulting from the operation of the airport by defendant/cross-appellant Port of Seattle.

It is pertinent to note that the Port's policy when acquiring property in the vicinity of the airport on a negotiated voluntary sale basis was to pay unimpacted value, i.e., the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Highline School District No. 401 v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Ackerman v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Martin v. Port of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1964
  4. State v. RothWashington Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Lange v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Burgess v. Premier Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  3. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Orion Corporation v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  5. State v. BlankWashington Supreme Court · 1997

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API