Legal Opinion

TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. Carp

Texas Supreme Court

Decided February 8, 1967No. A-11478PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

POPE, Justice.

Doctors Ellis Carp, S. J. Rogers, and N. Jay Rogers sued The Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry and sought a declaratory judgment that the Professional Responsibility Rule adopted on December 21, 1959 by the Board was void. They also asked for a permanent injunction against the Board’s enforcement of the rule. The trial court denied the relief prayed for and sustained the validity of the rule. The court of civil appeals held that although there was substantial evidence which supported the rule, the Board exceeded its delegated powers in promulgating it and therefore,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Grasso v. Cannon Ball Motor Freight LinesTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Campbell v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Pearle Optical of Monroeville, Inc. v. State Board of Examiners in OptometrySupreme Court of Georgia · 1963

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Friedman v. RogersSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Gerst v. Oak Cliff Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Pennsylvania State Board of Pharmacy v. CohenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  4. Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of PsychologistsTexas Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Employers Casualty Co. v. SloanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API