Legal Opinion
Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. Carp
Texas Supreme Court
Decided February 17, 1965No. A-10258PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEAKLEY, Justice.
This is an original mandamus proceeding. Relators are the Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry, and others 1. Respondents are Honorable Dallas Blankenship, Judge of the 101st Judicial District Court of Dallas County; Ellis Carp, a licensed optometrist practicing under various assumed names, including Lee Optical, Luck Optical, One Price Optical, Douglas Optical, Plains Optical, Mesa Optical, Mast Optical; and S. J. Rogers and N. Jay Rogers, licensed optometrists practicing under the assumed name of Texas State Optical.
Relators seek the extraordinary writ to require…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Gregoire v. BiddleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Spalding v. VilasSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Trapp v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1946
- State v. Standard Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1937
- State v. Ferguson KirbyTexas Supreme Court · 1939
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Eli Lilly and Co. v. MarshallTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Fariss v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1971
- Texas Department of Human Services v. Christian Care Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Pedernales Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Public Utility CommissionCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
- TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.