Legal Opinion

Kee v. Baber

Texas Supreme Court

Decided May 29, 1957No. A-6229PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Norvell

This is a direct appeal from an order of the District Court of Travis County, 53rd Judicial District, declaring the validity of certain rules adopted by the Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry and refusing to grant a permanent injunction restraining their enforcement. Article 5, Sec. 3-b, Constitution of Texas, Article 1738a, Vernon’s Ann. Texas Stats., Rule 499a, Texas Rules of Civil Procedure. Dr. John B. Kee, plaintiff below and interveners, Drs. Robert K. Shannon, Ellis Carp and Stanley C. Pearle contended that three rules promulgated by defendants, Dr. W. F. Baber and others as…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  3. Mobile, Jackson & Kansas City Railroad v. TurnipseedSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  5. Helvering v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Gerst v. Oak Cliff Savings and Loan AssociationTexas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Texas Liquor Control Board v. Attic Club, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1970
  3. TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Texas State Board of Examiners in Optometry v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1965

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API