Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists
Texas Supreme Court
Decided March 21, 1973No. B-3243PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ON MOTION FOR REHEARING
POPE, Justice.
The motion for rehearing is granted, the original and dissenting opinions are withdrawn and this opinion is substituted as the majority opinion of the court.
Dr. Wallace Bloom instituted suit in the 167th District Court of Travis County to obtain a writ of mandamus requiring the Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists to certify him as a psychologist under the grandfather clause of the Psychologists’ Certification and Licensing Act, Acts 1969, 61st Leg., p. 2059, ch. 713, Art. 4512c. Vernon’s Ann.Tex.Civ.Stats. The trial court, sitting without a…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Railroad Commission of Texas v. Shell Oil Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1942
- Watson v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Kee v. BaberTexas Supreme Court · 1957
- TEXAS STATE BOARD OF EXAMINERS IN OPTOMETRY v. CarpTexas Supreme Court · 1967
- State Ex Rel. Krausmann v. StreeterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Caballero v. Central Power and Light Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
- Texas Department of Criminal Justice v. Cooke, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2004
- Martine v. BD. OF REGENTS, STATE SR. COLLEGES, ETC.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1979
- Simms v. Lakewood Village Property Owners Ass'n, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1995
- Texas Association of Psychological Associates v. Texas State Board of Examiners of Psychologists and Texas Psychological Association, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2014
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.