Legal Opinion
Cornelius v. Rosario
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 11, 2012No. AC 33178PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BEACH, J.
The plaintiff, Frederick Cornelius, appeals from the trial court’s granting of a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants, the city of Hartford (city) and Lydia Rosario, the city’s then tax collector,1 and denial of his motion for summary judgment.2 The *4plaintiff claims that the court erred in (1) determining that he lacked standing to challenge the adequacy of notice to a predecessor in title of the real property at issue, (2) determining that the defendants satisfied the notice requirement of General Statutes § 12-157 (a), (3) concluding that the steps taken by…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jones v. FlowersSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. MurphySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. BarrettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Jacobson v. A1Z7, LLC (In re Jacobson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Dickman v. Office of State Ethics, Citizen's Ethics Advisory BoardConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Gianetti v. RutkinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Hospital of Central Connecticut v. Neurosurgical Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- E & M Custom Homes, LLC v. NegronConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.