Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. Sacks
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
This attorney discipline proceeding involves a lawyer who, chief among various forms of serious misconduct, misappropriated funds, fabricated documents, and made misrepresentations to courts, clients, and opposing counsel.
In this case, Stephen Howard Sacks, Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, represented seven clients, and himself, in separate matters that resulted in the institution of an attorney disciplinary proceeding and numerous findings of misconduct. Specifically, Sacks was retained to represent Jermaine D. Harris in a criminal case, to assist Joy Whyte with a meeting with an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. AllenbaughCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. ChanthunyaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. HaleyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. PlantaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. ConwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Attorney Grievance v. RheinsteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance v. RobbinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Attorney Grievance v. ConwellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019