Attorney Grievance Commission v. Barnett
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.
This attorney discipline proceeding concerns a Maryland lawyer who forged his client’s signature on an affidavit submitted to a circuit court, failed to communicate with his client and notify her of hearing dates, and made several misrepresentations of material fact to Bar Counsel during an investigation of his conduct.
Michael Francis Barnett (“Barnett”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, represented Sheila Wooden (‘Wooden”) in a child custody dispute. On October 12, 2011, Wooden filed a complaint against Barnett with the Attorney Grievance Commission (“the Commission”), Petitioner.
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. LangCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Attorney Grievance v. AmbeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.