Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance v. Conwell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided January 23, 2019No. 22ag/17PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Scott A. Conwell, Misc. Docket AG No. 22, September Term, 2017. Opinion by Battaglia, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT – Court of Appeals disbarred lawyer who engaged in conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice by failing to keep client reasonably informed about the status of client’s matter, failing to respond to client’s repeated reasonable requests for information, and failing to diligently pursue client’s equal opportunity claim; and who engaged in intentionally dishonest conduct by filing pleadings with the circuit…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SandersonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API