Legal Opinion
Attorney Grievance v. Rheinstein
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided January 24, 2020No. 77ag/15PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. Jason Edward Rheinstein, Misc. Docket AG No. 77, September Term, 2015. Opinion by Battaglia, J. ATTORNEY DISCIPLINE – SANCTIONS – DISBARMENT – Court of Appeals disbarred attorney who engaged in deceitful and dishonest conduct that was prejudicial to the administration of justice by misrepresenting facts to a circuit court judge in an effort to intimidate his opponents, advanced unsubstantiated claims of fraud against opposing party and led a tribunal to believe that opposing party had been facing criminal charges, without bases; his ill-motive was…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Kevin G. Kelly v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Rodriguez v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Attorney Grievance v. PlantaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
- Attorney Grievance v. TaniformCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Attorney Grievance v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021
- Attorney Grievance Comm'n v. WhittedCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Attorney Grievance v. ProctorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.