Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Chanthunya

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 25, 2016No. 58ag/14PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This attorney discipline proceeding involves an immigration lawyer who failed to represent two clients competently, diligently, and with adequate communication, and who was alleged to have committed a crime by touching a female client’s breast without her consent.

Alexander Manjanja Chanthunya (“Chanthunya”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, represented Souadou Traore (“Traore”) in her applications for a green card 1 and a waiver of grounds of inadmissibility, 2 and represented Therese Vanguere (‘Vanguere”) in an application for asylum. 3 Chanthunya failed to engage in sufficient…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ShulerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance v. Smith-ScottCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  2. Attorney Grievance v. AmbeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SlateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Attorney Grievance v. PlantaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Attorney Grievance v. MoawadCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2021

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API