Legal Opinion

Schreiber v. Duncan

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 22, 1952No. Civ. 4386PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.

Plaintiff brought an action against defendant alleging faulty workmanship in certain structural improvements in relation to the work done upon plaintiff’s residence by defendant in which plaintiff claimed damages in the sum of $1,832.50. Defendant was personally served with summons and complaint on March 23, 1951. He failed to appear. Default, upon application of plaintiff, was entered on April 4, 1951, and on April 5th, the clerk, for some undisclosed reason, entered judgment by default for the amount claimed. On July 5, 1951, three months later, Attorney Catalano filed his affidavit and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  2. Burns v. ScooffyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Karlein v. KarleinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Kester Motors, Inc. v. HaddadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. H. A. Pulaski, Inc. v. Abbey Contractor Specialties, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Fairfield v. AhlstromCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  3. Albertson v. WarrinerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Perrin v. CountrymanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API