Legal Opinion

Fairfield v. Ahlstrom

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 8, 1962No. Civ. 25732PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

ccording to the notice of appeal, defendant and appellant Ahlstrom herein appeals from an order of the court “denying the motion under section 473 of the Code of Civil Procedure of California for permission to file his memorandum of costs herein, which included appearance fee, cost of deposition and $100 additional costs as attorney fee because the complaint herein was for libel and the court granted a nonsuit in favor of this defendant.”

It appears from the record that plaintiff and respondent herein filed an action against defendant and others; the complaint was in two counts, the first of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Willett v. Schmeister Manufacturing Co.California Court of Appeal · 1926
  2. Schreiber v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  3. Farias v. FariasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Transit Ads, Inc. v. Tanner Motor Livery, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1969
  2. Metropolitan Service Corp. v. Casa De Palms, Ltd.California Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Mundt v. Alta Bates HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Telles v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API