Legal Opinion

Burns v. Scooffy

California Supreme Court

Decided May 13, 1893No. 14805PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Del Norte County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Searls,

This is an appeal by Mansfield Lovell and Lallah S. Highton, two of the defendants in the above-entitled cause, from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff. John Burns instituted the action against Ada M. Scoofiy, Lallah S. High-ton, Edith Cook, Mansfield Lovell, Robert T. Cottingham, Nelson R. Doolittle, and Harry J. Gray, to establish his right to purchase from the state of California the north half of section 35 (school land), in township 14 north, range 1 east, Humboldt meridian, and to have like applications of the defendants and each of them, to purchase from said state, declared…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Lestrade v. BarthCalifornia Supreme Court · 1862
  2. Hooper v. Wells, Fargo & Co.California Supreme Court · 1864
  3. Stringer v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Farmers' Natl. Gold Bank v. StoverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Morrison v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Frost v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. McDougald v. HuletCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Doolittle v. McConnellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Stub v. HarrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  5. Moss Estate Co. v. AdlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API