Perrin v. Countryman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
This action was instituted by plaintiffs, general excavating contractors, against defendant alleging in the first cause of action of their complaint that there was due from defendant $598.23 for services performed, and in a second cause of action that on July 23, 1950, defendant executed his promissory note in favor of plaintiffs for $5,500 and failed to pay it when due. Defendant was served personally with process and a writ of attachment was levied on his real property. On January 29, 1952, default was entered by the clerk at plaintiffs’ request, and on February 1st judgment by default was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Melde v. ReynoldsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Pacific Finance Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Dietlin v. General American Life InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Roehl v. the Texas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
- Kester Motors, Inc. v. HaddadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.