In Re the Marriage of Cassezza
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtBrewer, C. J.
Husband appeals a dissolution judgment, arguing that the trial court erred in (1) awarding wife transitional spousal support for which she was ineligible by the terms of ORS 107.105(l)(d)(A); and (2) awarding wife too much maintenance spousal support for too long a period of time. Because the notice of appeal in this case was filed after the effective date of the 2009 amendments to ORS 19.415(3), we have discretion whether to review the facts de novo. For the reasons explained below, we exercise our discretion to review de novo, and we modify the judgment of dissolution to delete the award of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of HARRISOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- In re the Marriage of BranscombCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In re the Marriage of RoppeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- In re the Marriage of AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
- In re the Marriage of PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Marriage of StuartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In re the Marriage of BrownCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In re the Marriage of JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- In re the Marriage of DeAngelesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- In re the Marriage of RodriguesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013