In re the Marriage of Roppe
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtKistler, J.
Husband appeals from a dissolution judgment that, in relevant part, awarded wife $1,000 a month in indefinite spousal maintenance support. He contends that, because wife is young, healthy, and capable of working full time, the court erred in awarding her indefinite support. On de novo review, we modify the trial court’s judgment.
Husband and wife married in 1983. At the time of the dissolution hearing, wife was 39 years old and husband was 41 years old. During most of the marriage, husband worked as a salesman. His base salary is $1,500 per month, and the rest of his income comes from…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In Re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GroveOregon Supreme Court · 1977
- In re LeyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Matter of Marriage of MaxwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- In re the Marriage of MaddenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- In re the Marriage of CullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In re the Marriage of PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
- In re the Marriage of GarzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of CassezzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
- In re the Marriage of OlesbergCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.