In re the Marriage of Brown
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
Wife appeals from a dissolution judgment enforcing a settlement agreement. She contends that the trial court erred as a matter of law in enforcing the agreement and in adopting the agreed-upon spousal support amount, without first determining that it was “just and equitable.” Wife also asserts that the court erred in awarding husband his attorney fees and costs. We conclude that the trial court erred, and, therefore, we vacate the judgment in part and remand.
In February 2011, wife sought dissolution of the parties’ eight-year marriage. At that time, wife was 45 and husband was 39. Wife had…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- McCarthy v. Oregon Freeze Dry, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Matter of Marriage of McDonnalOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Webber Ex Rel. Estate of Webber v. OlsenOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- Matter of Marriage of GrossmanOregon Supreme Court · 2005
- In re the Marriage of PottsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In re the Marriage of HaggertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2014
- In re the Marriage of HaggertyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
- Anderson and AbbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- In re SauterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- Anderson and AbbettCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.