In re the Marriage of Branscomb
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.
Wife appeals from a judgment dissolving the parties’ marriage. She assigns error to the trial court’s distribution of marital property and debts as well as its award of spousal support. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3), conditioned by the guideline that we will not modify a trial court’s division of property unless we decide that “a different division is significantly preferable,” Shlitter and Shlitter, 188 Or App 277, 283, 71 P3d 154 (2003), we conclude that, in all of those respects, the trial court erred to wife’s disadvantage. We therefore modify the judgment accordingly.
I. FACTUAL…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re the Marriage of HaguewoodOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Matter of Marriage of SticeOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- Matter of Marriage of LemkeOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- In re the Marriage of ShlitterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Congel v. MalfitanoCourt for the Trial of Impeachments and Correction of Errors · 2018
- In re the Marriage of MortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In re the Marriage of ChristensenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- In re the Marriage of CirinaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
- In Re the Marriage of CassezzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.