In re the Marriage of Austin
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Husband appeals from a judgment of dissolution of marriage, arguing that the trial court erred in its determination that wife was entitled to $750 per month of maintenance spousal support and $250 per month of compensatory spousal support for an indefinite period of time. Wife cross-assigns error, arguing that, even if the court erred in classifying some of the support as compensatory rather than maintenance support, the total support amount of $1,000 per month was appropriate. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and affirm.
The parties were married in 1969, when husband was 20 and wife was 16.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- In re the Marriage of TileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re the Marriage of AndersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- In Re the Marriage of HARRISOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- McCollum v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- In re the Marriage of GarzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- In Re the Marriage of CassezzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.