Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Austin

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 24, 2003No. 00C-32246; A115886PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.

Husband appeals from a judgment of dissolution of marriage, arguing that the trial court erred in its determination that wife was entitled to $750 per month of maintenance spousal support and $250 per month of compensatory spousal support for an indefinite period of time. Wife cross-assigns error, arguing that, even if the court erred in classifying some of the support as compensatory rather than maintenance support, the total support amount of $1,000 per month was appropriate. We review de novo, ORS 19.415(3), and affirm.

The parties were married in 1969, when husband was 20 and wife was 16.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Young v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Deluxe Cabinet Works v. MessmerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. In re the Marriage of TileyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. In re the Marriage of AndersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  2. In Re the Marriage of HARRISOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  3. McCollum v. Kmart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  4. In re the Marriage of GarzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  5. In Re the Marriage of CassezzaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API