Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of HARRIS

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 2010No. CC 0630166; CA A136179; SC S057887PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, C. J.

The issue in this dissolution of marriage case is whether the trial court erred in failing to award compensatory spousal support to wife. The trial court did not award compensatory support to wife, concluding that wife’s contribution during the marriage was not a significant contribution that enhanced husband’s earning potential. On appeal, the Court of Appeals held that the trial court’s rationale for denying compensatory spousal support to wife — viz., that wife’s contribution during the marriage was typical and expected and not a substantial contribution that enhanced husband’s earning…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  3. In Re Marriage of KunzeOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Matter of Marriage of DentonOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  5. In re the Marriage of AustinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. Ziska / GarzaOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  2. S060295 State v. McDowellOregon Supreme Court · 2012
  3. In re the Marriage of AndersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  4. State v. Juarez-HernandezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
  5. In Re the Marriage of AbramsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API