Legal Opinion

Guckenberg v. Wisconsin Central Ltd.

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided December 19, 2001No. 2:00-cv-00691PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RANDA, District Judge.

The defendants, Wisconsin Central Ltd. and Fox Valley & Western Ltd. (collectively ‘WCL”), are both Illinois corporations which provide rail transportation services in Wisconsin, Minnesota, Illinois, and the Upper Peninsula of Michigan (“U.P.”). On March 30, 2000, the plaintiffs, Peter and Susan Guckenberg (“the Guckenbergs”), residents of the Town of Menasha, Wisconsin, commenced a suit against WCL in the Circuit Court of Winnebago County. The complaint alleges that the defendants’ actions in operating railway traffic amounts to a common law nuisance…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  4. San Diego Building Trades Council v. GarmonSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Port City Properties v. Union Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Maynard v. CSX Transportation, Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2004
  3. Strasburg Scooters, LLC v. Strasburg Rail Rd., Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  4. Pejepscot Industrial Park, Inc. v. Maine Central RailroadDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2003
  5. A & W Properties, Inc. v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2006

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API