Legal Opinion
Lindsay v. King
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 9, 1956No. Civ. 16478PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
The plaintiffs, the owners of the Emery Ranch in Santa Cruz County, brought this action against the owners of the nearby Wright Ranch to establish their right to one-half of the flow of water from a certain spring located on the Wright Ranch, and to compel the defendant Agnes Cox, now Agnes Cox Wright, the present owner of the Wright Ranch, to remove certain improvements on the Wright Ranch that are alleged to interfere with plaintiffs’ water rights. Defendant Agnes Cox cross-complained for declaratory relief, claiming that she owns all of the waters flowing from the spring in question. The…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- City of Pasadena v. City of AlhambraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Bathgate v. IrvineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- People v. SayigCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brewer v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Shupe v. NelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Jones v. HarmonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Cleary v. TrimbleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.