Legal Opinion

Shupe v. Nelson

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 27, 1967No. Civ. 23710PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.

On this appeal from a judgment on a cross-complaint decreeing the reformation of appellants’ deeds to provide. access to a roadway for a lot owned by plaintiffs and respondents, Frank and Geraldine Shupe (hereafter Shupes), 1 the contentions are that: respondents had no standing to seek the relief granted pursuant to section 3399 of the Civil Code; the evidence does not support the judgment as to the mutual mistake of the parties in omitting the reservation of access rights for the benefit of the Shupe property; and the court exceeded its jurisdiction by further ordering appellants to execute…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Lemoge Electric v. County of San MateoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Bailard v. MardenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. Mills v. SchulbaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  4. Merkle v. MerkleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. California Pacific Title Co. v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Jolley v. Chase Home Finance, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
  2. Appalachian Insurance v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Jensen v. Quality Loan Service Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2010
  4. Western Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Heflin Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 1992
  5. American Home Insurance v. Travelers Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API