Legal Opinion

Jones v. Harmon

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 7, 1959No. Civ. 23735PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHerndon, J.

This is an action in which the seven plaintiffs sought to establish an easement across defendant’s property for a pipeline by which irrigation water had been supplied to plaintiffs’ property for some 30 years before the commencement of the litigation. Plaintiffs also sought injunctive relief directing defendant to remove an obstruction which she had placed in the pipeline and money damages for the loss of crops, trees and vines resulting from defendant’s interference with their irrigation water supply.

There was a judgment for plaintiffs in which defendant was enjoined from interfering with or…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Nichols v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. O'BANION v. BorbaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. City of Los Angeles v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Crockett Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. Pollard v. RebmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Field-Escandon v. DeMannCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  2. Zimmer v. DykstraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  3. Kerr Land & Timber Co. v. EmmersonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  4. City of Corpus Christi v. KrauseCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. LeDeit v. EhlertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API