Legal Opinion

Hibbing Taconite Co. v. Minnesota Public Service Commission

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 12, 1980No. 50513, 51103 and 50500PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TODD, Justice.

Minnesota Power & Light Company (MPL) filed a notice of rate change with the Minnesota Public Service Commission (PSC) on April 5, 1977. Following statutory procedure, the rate increase was suspended, then reinstated, subject to refund, and hearings commenced August 15, 1977, before a hearing officer. The report of the hearing officer was accepted in part and rejected in part by the PSC, and its order allowing rate increases was filed on February 3, 1978. Supplemental orders were filed on June 19, 1978, and July 10, 1978. Hibbing Taconite Co. (Hibbing), one of the intervenors in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Bluefield Water Works & Improvement Co. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  3. St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce v. Minnesota Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  4. Northwestern Bell Telephone Company v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  5. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Mountain Fuel Supply Co. v. Public Service Commission of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Minnesota Power & Light Co. v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. City of Moorhead v. Minnesota Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Schermer v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. Petition of Northern States Power Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API