Legal Opinion

Borax Consolidated, Ltd. v. Los Angeles

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 11, 1935No. 34PublishedCited by 192 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Hughes

The City of Los Angeles brought this suit to quiet title to land claimed to be tideland of Mormon Island situated in the inner bay of San Pedro now known .as Los Angeles Harbor. The City asserted title under a legislative grant by the State. Stats. Cal. 1911, p. 1256; 1917, p. 159. Petitioners claimed under a preemption patent issued by the United States on December 30, 1881, to one William Banning. The District Court entered a decree, upon findings, dismissing the complaint upon the merits and adjudging that petitioner, Borax Consolidated, Limited, was the owner in fee simple and entitled to…

2Cases cited51 opinions

  1. Crowell v. BensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Shively v. BowlbySupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Pollard's Lessee v. HAGANSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  4. Donnelly v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  5. Smelting Co. v. KempSupreme Court of the United States · 1882

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by192 opinions

  1. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. United States v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

187 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API