Legal Opinion

Lorenz v. Hunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 3, 1928No. Docket No. 3356PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.

This is an action for personal injuries. Plaintiff was given judgment and the defendant has appealed.

The defendant was a deputy sheriff at the time of the alleged injuries. April 15, 1924, he purchased about two acres of land on which there was a dwelling-house. The plaintiff and her husband were then in possession of the premises as tenants from month to month, and they continued in possession as such tenants until after the infliction of the injuries. The evidence shows that their possession was rightful and exclusive. Without their consent or permission the defendant put about 40 hogs on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. Crescent Lumber Co. v. LarsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Riverside Water Co. v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Walker v. ChanslorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
  5. People v. RossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Vaughn v. JonasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Scruggs v. HaynesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
  3. Daluiso v. BooneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Hall v. BerkellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  5. Belm v. PatrickCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API