Legal Opinion

Crescent Lumber Co. v. Larson

California Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1913No. S.F. No. 6109PublishedCited by 38 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. L. R. Weinmann, and Weinmann, Wood & Cunha, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

This action was brought by plaintiff as indorsee of a promissory note for $5,734.44, dated August 27,1909, payable one day after date, and made by the defendant William Larson to the Harbor Lumber Company or order. The complaint alleged that, with the exception of four hundred and thirty dollars paid on the principal, no part of the principal or interest due on the note had been paid.

The defendant’s answer, after denying plaintiff’s corporate capacity, and the indorsement to plaintiff, alleged that the note had been fully paid. By way of cross-complaint, he alleged that plaintiff was indebted…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crim v. KessingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Biddel v. BrizzolaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Toby v. Oregon Pacific RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Barbieri v. RamelliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Savings Bank of San Diego v. Central Market Co.California Supreme Court · 1898

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Brown v. JensenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Kirk v. CulleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Salter v. UlrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API