Riverside Water Co. v. Gage
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Bernardino County denying a new trial. James A. Gibson, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court, reported in 89 Cal. 416, and in the opinion of the court in this case.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
An appeal from the judgment in this action has been heretofore heard and determined. (Riverside Water Co. v. Gage, 89 Cal. 410.) The present appeal is from an order denying the defendant’s motion for a new trial, made subsequent to the affirmance of the judgment. The main portion of the argument on behalf of the appellant is that, inasmuch as the evidence before the court showed that the defendant is the owner of lands riparian to the Santa Ana river above the plaintiff’s point of diversion, the plaintiff could not acquire a right of diversion by prescription against defendant, as such…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Brison v. BrisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Klauber v. San Diego Street Car Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- In re GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Riverside Water Co. v. GageCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by37 opinions
- Foreman & Clark Corp. v. FallonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Trafton v. YoungbloodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Baar v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. GlazeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
- Miller v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.