Legal Opinion

People v. Ross

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 16, 1912No. Crim. No. 244PublishedCited by 8 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Imperial County, and from an order denying a motion for a new trial. Franklin J. Cole, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Earl Rogers, W. H. Dehm, and H. L. Giesler, for Appellant.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

Defendant was convicted upon an information charging him with the crime of assault with a deadly weapon. The judgment of the court was that he be imprisoned for a term of one year in the state prison at Folsom and pay a fine of $2,000.

From this judgment and an order denying his motion for a new trial defendant appeals.

At the time in question defendant was conducting a public feed-yard in the city of Imperial, within which inclosure was located a shack or house wherein he lived. Victor Sterling, upon whom the alleged assault was committed, was city recorder of Imperial. Some time prior to the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. MontgomeryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. HubbardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  2. McClannan v. ChaplainSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923
  3. People v. HuppCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Noce v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  5. Lorenz v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API