Legal Opinion
Dolan v. City of Tigard
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided July 1, 1993No. LUBA 91-161. CA A73769, SC S39393PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*112VAN HOOMISSEN, J.
Petitioners in this land use case seek review of a Court of Appeals’ decision affirming a Final Opinion and Order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) in favor of respondent City of Tigard (city). Dolan v. City of Tigard, 113 Or App 162, 832 P2d 853 (1992). The issue is whether city has demonstrated the required relationship between the conditions that it attached to its approval of petitioners’ proposed land use and the expected impacts of that land use.1 Petitioners argue that, because city failed to demonstrate an “essential nexus” or a “substantial relationship”…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Nollan v. California Coastal CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Agins v. City of TiburonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. DeBenedictisSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Dolan v. City of TigardSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bowles v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Sparks v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Sparks v. Douglas CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1995
- Stevens v. City of Cannon BeachOregon Supreme Court · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.