Legal Opinion
Stockton East Water District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided January 27, 2015No. 04-541CPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL FINAL JUDGMENT
RCFC 54(b); 28 U.S.C. § 2517; Partial Final Judgment
KAPLAN, Judge.
This breach of contract case is before the Court on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit for the second time. Stockton E. Water Dist. v. United States, 761 F.3d 1344 (Fed.Cir.2014). In its most recent decision, the Federal Circuit affirmed this court’s award of $149,950 in cost-of-eover damages to the plaintiff, Central San Joaquin Water Conservation District (“Central”). At the same time, it directed this court to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- King Instrument Corporation v. Otari CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2006
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
- Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Georgia Power Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Kingston v. International Business Machines CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
- Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.