Stockton East Water District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
In the dry western regions of California, water can be as precious as gold. Pitting institutional consumers against the environment, the instant ease presents a complicated dispute regarding how state-controlled water, captured and contained in a federal reservoir, should be distributed and used.
The municipal-entity plaintiffs contracted for a share of this water, but contend they received less than they bargained for. The United States Bureau of Reclamation is the entity that controls the reservoir and distributed some of its water for environmental purposes rather than…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Klamath Irrigation District v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.