Legal Opinion
Stockton East Water District v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided May 18, 2007No. 04-541LPublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
CHRISTINE O.C. MILLER, Judge.
On February 20, 2007, an opinion issued finding and concluding that plaintiffs failed to prove their case by a preponderance of the evidence and entering judgment for defendant. See Stockton E. Water Dist. v. United States, 75 Fed.Cl. 321 (2007). Plaintiffs’ Motion for Reconsideration was filed on March 7, 2007. Defendant filed its opposition on March 27, 2007, and plaintiffs replied on April 6, 2007. On April 9, 2007, plaintiffs submitted notice of Carabetta Enterprises, Inc. v. United States, 482 F.3d 1360 (Fed.Cir. 2007).…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Yuba Natural Resources, Inc. v. The United States, Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Bowen v. Public Agencies Opposed to Social Security EntrapmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Stockton East Water District v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- Southern Nuclear Operating Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Wisconsin Electric Power Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- System Fuels, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Totolo/King Joint Venture v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.