Legal Opinion

Kingston v. International Business Machines Corporation

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided December 23, 2022No. 2:19-cv-01488Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON AT SEATTLE 9 10 SCOTT KINGSTON, CASE NO. C19-1488 MJP 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ON REMITTITUR, MOTION FOR ENTRY OF FINAL 12 v. JUDGMENT, AND MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES 13 INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION, 14 Defendant. 15 16 17 This matter comes before the Court on the Ninth Circuit’s Memorandum Decision 18 remanding this matter on the issue of remittitur (Dkt. No. 198), Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of 19 Final Judgment (Dkt. No. 216), and Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees (Dkt. No. 220). 20 Having reviewed:…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. Wei Zhang v. American Gem Seafoods, Inc., Delaware Corporation McMi Food Company, a Texas Corporation Harry Lees, a Natural PersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Chuong Van Pham v. Seattle City LightWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Bunch v. King County Department of Youth ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API