Legal Opinion
Entergy Nuclear Palisades, LLC v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided July 17, 2015No. 12-641CPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Motion for Reconsideration; Entry of Partial Judgment; RCFC 59; RCFC 60; RCFC 54; Spent Nuclear Fuel; Breach of Contract; Agreed-upon Portion of Damages
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
FIRESTONE, Judge.
The government has filed the present motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 71, asking this court to revisit its decision to enter partial judgment under Rule 54(b) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”) in favor of the plaintiff, Entergy Nuclear Palisades (“ENP”), for the undisputed portion of damages in this spent nuclear fuel case. According to…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Curtiss-Wright Corp. v. General Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. MacKeySupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Caldwell, Iii v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Entergy Nuclear Generation Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
- Georgia Power Company v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Local Initiative Health Authority for Los Angeles County v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.